Strengths and weaknesses of guideline approaches to safeguard voluntary informed consent of patients within a dependent relationship
نویسندگان
چکیده
BACKGROUND It is thought that a dependent relationship between patients and physicians who enroll their own patients in research compromises voluntary informed consent. Therefore, several ethical guidelines for human subject research provide approaches to mitigate these compromises. Currently, these approaches have not been critically evaluated. In this article, we analyze the approaches of ethical guidelines to manage the influence of a dependent relationship between patients and physicians on voluntary informed consent and discuss the strengths and weaknesses of these approaches. METHODS We performed a review of international ethical guidance documents on human subject research, listed in the Oxford Textbook of Clinical Research Ethics and found through cross referencing. We also searched Global Ethics Observatory (GEObs) and the World Health Organization (WHO) website. Guidelines from all years were eligible for inclusion. The date last searched was December 2013. DISCUSSION We identified two basic guideline approaches: 1. A process approach, which focuses on the person who obtains informed consent, that is, an independent individual, such as a research nurse or counselor; and 2. A content approach, emphasizing the voluntary nature of participation. Both approaches are valuable, either because the influence of the physician may diminish or because it empowers patients to make voluntary decisions. However, the approaches also face challenges. First, research nurses are not always independent. Second, physician-investigators will be informed about decisions of their patients. Third, involvement of a counselor is sometimes unfeasible. Fourth, the right to withdraw may be difficult to act upon in a dependent relationship. CONCLUSIONS Current guideline approaches to protect voluntary informed consent within a dependent relationship are suboptimal. To prevent compromises to voluntary informed consent, consent should not only be obtained by an independent individual, but this person should also emphasize the voluntary nature of participation. At the same time, dependency as such does not imply undue influence. Sometimes the physician may be best qualified to provide information, for example, for a very specialized study. Still, the research nurse should obtain informed consent. In addition, patients should be able to consult a counselor, who attends the informed consent discussions and is concerned with their interests. Finally, both physicians and research nurses should disclose research interests.
منابع مشابه
Assessing the quality of receiving patients’ informed consent in the surgical wards of hospitals affiliated to Zanjan University of Medical Sciences
Background: Informed consent is the cornerstone of medical ethics and is related to four out of ten articles of the patient's legal charter, aimed at supporting the patient and clarifies ethical principles in the physician-patient relationship. Objectives: The purpose of this study was to assess the quality of receiving patients’ informed consent in the surgical wards in Zanjan University of M...
متن کاملA Qualitative Study into Dependent Relationships and Voluntary Informed Consent for Research in Pediatric Oncology
BACKGROUND In pediatric oncology, many oncologists invite their own patients to participate in research. Inclusion within a dependent relationship is considered to potentially compromise voluntariness of consent. Currently, it is unknown to what extent those involved in pediatric oncology experience the dependent relationship as a threat to voluntary informed consent, and what they see as safeg...
متن کاملEvaluation of The Quality of Obtaining Informed Consent for Spinal Anesthesia in Patients, Candidate for Gynecological Surgery Referred to Alzahra Hospital During 2021
Background: Obtaining informed consent (IC) is essential for any diagnostic or therapeutic procedure. IC is an important legal communication process between the patient and physician. Objective: This study was performed to evaluate the quality of IC process in patients undergoing spinal anesthesia (SA) in gynecological surgeries. Methods: During 2021 this cross-sectional study was performed i...
متن کاملبررسی سیر تغییرات بیانیهی هلسینکی و تفاوتهای ویرایش سال 2008 نسبت به 2004
The Declaration of Helsinki, the most creditable ethical guideline for medical research on human subjects, has been updated 8 times since its establishment and the last revision was in 2008. Researchers, medical research subjects, authors, members of ethics committees, and editors of medical journals must be informed of the tenets of the Helsinki declaration in order to improve achievements of ...
متن کاملبیانیهی هلسینکی ویرایش 2008، ترجمهی فارسی و چالشهای آن
The Declaration of Helsinki, the most creditable ethical guideline for medical research on human subjects, has been updated 8 times since its establishment and the last revision was in 2008. Researchers, medical research subjects, authors, members of ethics committees, and editors of medical journals must be informed of the tenets of the Helsinki declaration in order to improve achievements of ...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
دوره 12 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2014